|
Chapter II
The Imperfection of Past Aggregates
THE WHOLE process of Nature depends on a balancing and a constant tendency to harmony between two poles of life, the individual whom the whole or aggregate nourishes and the whole or aggregate which the individual helps to constitute. Human life forms no exception to the rule. Therefore the perfection of human life must involve the elaboration of an as yet unaccomplished harmony between these two poles of our existence, the individual and the social aggregate. The perfect society will be that which most entirely favours the perfection of the individual; the perfection of the individual will be incomplete if it does not help towards the perfect state of the social aggregate to which he belongs and eventually to that of the largest possible human aggregate, the whole of a united humanity. For the gradual process of Nature introduces a complication which prevents the individual from standing in a pure and direct relation to the totality of mankind. Between himself and this too immense whole there erect themselves partly as aids, partly as barriers to the final unity the lesser aggregates which it has been necessary to form in the progressive stages of human culture. For the obstacles of space, the difficulties of organisation and the limitations of the human heart and brain have necessitated the formation first of small, then of larger and yet larger aggregates so that he may be gradually trained by a progressive approach till he is ready for the final universality. The family, the commune, the clan or tribe, the class, the city state or congeries of tribes, the nation, the empire are so many stages in this progress and constant enlargement. If the smaller aggregates were destroyed as soon as the larger are successfully formed, this graduation would result in no complexity; but Nature does not follow this course. She seldom destroys entirely the types she has once made or only destroys that for which there is no longer any utility;
Page – 285 the rest she keeps in order to serve her need or her passion for variety, richness, multiformity and only effaces the dividing lines or modifies the characteristics and relations sufficiently to allow of the larger unity she is creating. Therefore at every step humanity is confronted with various problems which arise not only from the difficulty of accord between the interests of the individual and those of the immediate aggregate, the community, but between the need and interests of the smaller integralities and the growth of that larger whole which is to ensphere them all. History has preserved for us scattered instances of this travail, instances of failure and success which are full of instruction. We see the struggle towards the aggregation of tribes among the Semitic nations, Jew and Arab, surmounted in the one after a scission into two kingdoms which remained a permanent source of weakness to the Jewish nation, overcome only temporarily in the other by the sudden unifying force of Islam. We see the failure of clan life to combine into an organised national existence in the Celtic races, a failure entire in Ireland and Scotland and only surmounted through the crushing out of clan life by a foreign rule and culture, overcome only at the last moment in Wales. We see the failure of the city states and small regional peoples to fuse themselves in the history of Greece, the signal success of a similar struggle of Nature in the development of Roman Italy. The whole past of India for the last two thousand years and more has been the attempt, unavailing in spite of many approximations to success, to overcome the centrifugal tendency of an extraordinary number and variety of disparate elements, the family, the commune, the clan, the caste, the small regional state or people, the large linguistic unit, the religious community, the nation within the nation. We may perhaps say that here Nature tried an experiment of unparalleled complexity and potential richness, accumulating all possible difficulties in order to arrive at the most opulent result. But in the end the problem proved insoluble or, at least, was not solved and Nature had to resort to her usual deus ex machina denouement, the instrumentality of a foreign rule. But even when the nation is sufficiently organised, — the largest unit yet successfully developed by Nature, — entire unity is not always achieved.
Page – 286
If no other elements of discord remain, yet the
conflict of classes is always possible. And the phenomenon leads us
to another rule of this gradual development of Nature in human life
which we shall find of very considerable importance when we come to
the question of a realisable human unity. The perfection of the
individual in a perfected society or eventually in a perfected
humanity — understanding perfection always in a relative and
progressive sense — is the inevitable aim of Nature. But the
progress of all the individuals in a society does not proceed
pari passu, with an equal and equable march. Some advance, others remain
stationary — absolutely or relatively, — others fall back.
Consequently the emergence of a dominant class is inevitable within
the aggregate itself, just as in the constant clash between the
aggregates the emergence of dominant nations is inevitable. That
class will predominate which develops most perfectly the type Nature
needs at the time for her progress or, it may be, for her
retrogression. If she demands power and strength of character, a
dominant aristocracy emerges; if knowledge and science, a dominant
literary or savant class; if practical ability, ingenuity, economy
and efficient organisation, a dominant bourgeoisie or Vaishya class,
usually with the lawyer at the head; if diffusion rather than
concentration of general well-being and a close organisation of
toil, then even the domination of an artisan class is not
impossible.
But this phenomenon, whether of dominant classes or dominant
nations, can never be more than a temporary necessity; for the final
aim of Nature in human life cannot be the exploitation of the many
by the few or even of the few by the many, can never be the
perfection of some at the cost of the abject submergence and
ignorant subjection of the bulk of humanity; these can only be
transient devices. Therefore we see that such dominations bear
always in them the seed of their own destruction. They must pass
either by the ejection or destruction of the exploiting element or
else by a fusion and equalisation. We see in Europe and America that
the dominant Brahmin and the dominant Kshatriya have been either
abolished or are on the point of subsidence into equality with the
general mass.
Page – 287
Two rigidly separate classes alone remain, the dominant propertied class and
the labourer, and all the most significant movements of the day have for
their purpose the abolition of this last superiority. In this persistent
tendency, Europe has obeyed one great law of Nature’s progressive march, her
trend towards a final equality. Absolute equality is surely neither intended
nor possible, just as absolute uniformity is both impossible and utterly
undesirable; but a fundamental equality which will render the play of true
superiority and difference inoffensive, is essential to any conceivable
perfectibility of the human race.
Therefore, the perfect counsel for a dominant minority is always to
recognise in good time the right hour for its abdication and for the
imparting of its ideals, qualities, culture, experience to the rest
of the aggregate or to as much of it as is prepared for that
progress. Where this is done, the social aggregate advances normally
and without disruption or serious wound or malady; otherwise a
disordered progress is imposed upon it, for Nature will not suffer
human egoism to baffle for ever her fixed intention and necessity.
Where the dominant classes successfully avoid her demand upon them,
the worst of destinies is likely to overtake the social aggregate, —
as in India where the final refusal of the Brahmin and other
privileged classes to call up the bulk of the nation as far as
possible to their level, their fixing of an unbridgeable gulf of
superiority between themselves and the rest of society, has been a
main cause of eventual decline and degeneracy. For where her aims
are frustrated, Nature inevitably withdraws her force from the
offending unit till she has brought in and used other and external
means to reduce the obstacle to a nullity.
But even if the unity within is made as perfect as social,
administrative and cultural machinery can make it, the question of
the individual still remains. For these social units or aggregates
are not like the human body in which the component cells are capable
of no separate life apart from the aggregate.
Page – 288
The human individual tends to exist in himself and to exceed the
limits of the family, the clan, the class, the nation; and even,
that self-sufficiency on one side, that universality on the
other are the essential elements of his perfection. Therefore,
just as the systems of social aggregation which depend on the
domination of a class or classes over others must change or
dissolve, so the social aggregates which stand in the way of
this perfection of the individual and seek to coerce him within
their limited mould and into the rigidity of a narrow culture or
petty class or national interest, must find their term and their
day of change or destruction under the irresistible impulsion of
progressing Nature.
Page – 289 |