|
Chapter IX
Civilisation and Culture
NATURE starts from Matter, develops out of it its hidden Life, releases out of involution in life all the crude material of Mind and, when she is ready, turns Mind upon itself and upon Life and Matter in a great mental effort to understand all three in their phenomena, their obvious action, their secret laws, their normal and abnormal possibilities and powers so that they may be turned to the richest account, used in the best and most harmonious way, elevated to their highest as well as extended to their widest potential aims by the action of that faculty which man alone of terrestrial creatures clearly possesses, the intelligent will. It is only in this fourth stage of her progress that she arrives at humanity. The atoms and the elements organise brute Matter, the plant develops the living being, the animal prepares and brings to a certain kind of mechanical organisation the crude material of Mind, but the last work of all, the knowledge and control of all these things and self-knowledge and self-control, — that has been reserved for Man, Nature’s mental being. That he may better do the work she has given him, she compels him to repeat physically and to some extent mentally stages of her animal evolution and, even when he is in possession of his mental being, she induces him continually to dwell with an interest and even a kind of absorption upon Matter and Life and his own body and vital existence. This is necessary to the largeness of her purpose in him. His first natural absorption in the body and the life is narrow and unintelligent; as his intelligence and mental force increase, he disengages himself to some extent, is able to mount higher, but is still tied to his vital and material roots by need and desire and has to return upon them with a larger curiosity, a greater power of utilisation, a more and more highly mental and, in the end, a more and more spiritual aim in the return. Page –82 For his cycles are circles of a growing, but still imperfect harmony and synthesis, and she brings him back violently to her original principles, sometimes even to something like her earlier conditions so that he may start afresh on a larger curve of progress and self-fulfilment. It would seem at first sight that since man is pre-eminently the mental being, the development of the mental faculties and the richness of the mental life should be his highest aim, — his preoccupying aim, even, as soon as he has got rid of the obsession of the life and body and provided for the indispensable satisfaction of the gross needs which our physical and animal nature imposes on us. Knowledge, science, art, thought, ethics, philosophy, religion, this is man’s real business, these are his true affairs. To be is for him not merely to be born, grow up, marry, get his livelihood, support a family and then die, — the vital and physical life, a human edition of the animal round, a human enlargement of the little animal sector and arc of the divine circle; rather to become and grow mentally and live with knowledge and power within himself as well as from within outward is his manhood. But there is here a double motive of Nature, an insistent duality in her human purpose. Man is here to learn from her how to control and create; but she evidently means him not only to control, create and constantly re-create in new and better forms himself, his own inner existence, his mentality, but also to control and re-create correspondingly his environment. He has to turn Mind not only on itself, but on Life and Matter and the material existence; that is very clear not only from the law and nature of the terrestrial evolution, but from his own past and present history. And there comes from the observation of these conditions and of his highest aspirations and impulses the question whether he is not intended, not only to expand inwardly and outwardly, but to grow upward, wonderfully exceeding himself as he has wonderfully exceeded his animal beginnings, into something more than mental, more than human, into a being spiritual and divine. Even if he cannot do that, yet he may have to open his mind to what is beyond it and to govern his life more and more by the light and power that he receives from something greater than himself. Man’s consciousness of the divine within himself and the world is the supreme fact of his existence and to grow into that may very well be the intention of his nature. Page –83 In any case the fullness of Life is his evident object, the widest life and the highest life possible to him, whether that be a complete humanity or a new and divine race. We must recognise both his need of integrality and his impulse of self-exceeding if we would fix rightly the meaning of his individual existence and the perfect aim and norm of his society. The pursuit of the mental life for its own sake is what we ordinarily mean by culture; but the word is still a little equivocal and capable of a wider or a narrower sense according to our ideas and predilections. For our mental existence is a very complex matter and is made up of many elements. First, we have its lower and fundamental stratum, which is in the scale of evolution nearest to the vital. And we have in that stratum two sides, the mental life of the senses, sensations and emotions in which the subjective purpose of Nature predominates although with the objective as its occasion, and the active or dynamic life of the mental being concerned with the organs of action and the field of conduct in which her objective purpose predominates although with the subjective as its occasion. We have next in the scale, more sublimated, on one side the moral being and its ethical life, on the other the aesthetic; each of them attempts to possess and dominate the fundamental mind stratum and turn its experiences and activities to its own benefit, one for the culture and worship of Right, the other for the culture and worship of Beauty. And we have, above all these, taking advantage of them, helping, forming, trying often to govern them entirely, the intellectual being. Man’s highest accomplished range is the life of the reason or ordered and harmonised intelligence with its dynamic power of intelligent will, the buddhi, which is or should be the driver of man’s chariot. But the intelligence of man is not composed entirely and exclusively of the rational intellect and the rational will; there enters into it a deeper, more intuitive, more splendid and powerful, but much less clear, much less developed and as yet hardly at all self-possessing light and force for which we have not even a name. Page –84 But, at any rate, its character is to drive at a kind of illumination, — not the dry light of the reason, nor the moist and suffused light of the heart, but a lightning and a solar splendour. It may indeed subordinate itself and merely help the reason and heart with its flashes; but there is another urge in it, its natural urge, which exceeds the reason. It tries to illuminate the intellectual being, to illuminate the ethical and aesthetic, to illuminate the emotional and the active, to illuminate even the senses and the sensations. It offers in words of revelation, it unveils as if by lightning flashes, it shows in a sort of mystic or psychic glamour or brings out into a settled but for mental man almost a supernatural light a Truth greater and truer than the knowledge given by Reason and Science, a Right larger and more divine than the moralist’s scheme of virtues, a Beauty more profound, universal and entrancing than the sensuous or imaginative beauty worshipped by the artist, a joy and divine sensibility which leaves the ordinary emotions poor and pallid, a Sense beyond the senses and sensations, the possibility of a diviner Life and action which man’s ordinary conduct of life hides away from his impulses and from his vision. Very various, very fragmentary, often very confused and misleading are its effects upon all the lower members from the reason downward, but this in the end is what it is driving at in the midst of a hundred deformations. It is caught and killed or at least diminished and stifled in formal creeds and pious observances; it is unmercifully traded in and turned into poor and base coin by the vulgarity of conventional religions; but it is still the light of which the religious spirit and the spirituality of man is in pursuit and some pale glow of it lingers even in their worst degradations. This very complexity of his mental being, with the absence of any one principle which can safely dominate the others, the absence of any sure and certain light which can guide and fix in their vacillations the reason and the intelligent will, is man’s great embarrassment and stumbling-block. Page –85 All the hostile distinctions, oppositions, antagonisms, struggles, conversions, reversions, perversions of his mentality, all the chaotic war of ideas and impulses and tendencies which perplex his efforts, have arisen from the natural misunderstandings and conflicting claims of his many members. His reason is a judge who gives conflicting verdicts and is bribed and influenced by the suitors; his intelligent will is an administrator harassed by the conflicts of the different estates of his realm and by the sense of his own partiality and final incompetence. Still in the midst of it all he has formed certain large ideas of culture and the mental life, and his conflicting notions about them follow certain definite lines determined by the divisions of his nature and shaped into a general system of curves by his many attempts to arrive either at an exclusive standard or an integral harmony. We have first the distinction between civilisation and barbarism. In its ordinary, popular sense civilisation means the state of civil society, governed, policed, organised, educated, possessed of knowledge and appliances as opposed to that which has not or is not supposed to have these advantages. In a certain sense the Red Indian, the Basuto, the Fiji islander had their civilisation; they possessed a rigorously, if simply organised society, a social law, some ethical ideas, a religion, a kind of training, a good many virtues in some of which, it is said, civilisation is sadly lacking; but we are agreed to call them savages and barbarians, mainly it seems, because of their crude and limited knowledge, the primitive rudeness of their appliances and the bare simplicity of their social organisation. In the more developed states of society we have such epithets as semi-civilised and semi-barbarous which are applied by different types of civilisation to each other, — the one which is for a time dominant and physically successful has naturally the loudest and most self-confident say in the matter. Formerly men were more straightforward and simpleminded and frankly expressed their standpoint by stigmatising all peoples different in general culture from themselves as barbarians or Mlechchhas. The word civilisation so used comes to have a merely relative significance or hardly any fixed sense at all. Page –86
We must therefore get rid in it of all that is
temporary or accidental and fix it upon this distinction that
barbarism is the state of society in which man is almost entirely
preoccupied with his life and body, his economic and physical existence, —
at first with their sufficient maintenance, not as yet their greater or richer well-being,
— and has few means and little inclination
to develop his mentality, while civilisation is the more evolved state of society in which to a sufficient social and economic
organisation is added the activity of the mental life in most if not all of its parts; for sometimes some of these parts are left
aside or discouraged or temporarily atrophied by their inactivity, yet the society may be very obviously civilised and even
highly civilised. This conception will bring in all the civilisations historic and prehistoric and put aside all the barbarism,
whether of Africa or Europe or Asia, Hun or Goth or Vandal or Turcoman. It is obvious that in a state of barbarism the
rude beginnings of civilisation may exist; it is obvious too that in a civilised society a great mass of barbarism or numerous
relics of it may exist. In that sense all societies are semi-civilised. How much of our present-day civilisation will be looked back
upon with wonder and disgust by a more developed humanity as the superstitions and atrocities of an imperfectly civilised era!
But the main point is this that in any society which we can call civilised the mentality of man must be active, the mental
pursuits developed and the regulation and improvement of his life by the mental being a clearly self-conscious concept in his
better mind.
But in a civilised society there is still the
distinction between the partially, crudely, conventionally civilised
and the cultured. It would seem therefore that the mere
participation in the ordinary benefits of civilisation is not enough
to raise a man into the mental life proper; a farther development, a
higher elevation is needed. The last generation drew emphatically
the distinction between the cultured man and the Philistine and got
a fairly clear idea of what was meant by it. Roughly, the Philistine
was for them the man who lives outwardly the civilised life,
possesses all its paraphernalia, has and mouths the current stock of
opinions, prejudices, conventions, sentiments, but is impervious to
ideas, exercises no free intelligence, is innocent of beauty and
art, vulgarises everything that he touches, religion, ethics,
literature, life.
Page –87
The Philistine is in fact the modern civilised barbarian; he is often the half-civilised physical and vital barbarian by his
unintelligent attachment to the life of the body, the life of the vital needs and impulses and the ideal of the merely domestic
and economic human animal; but essentially and commonly he is the mental barbarian, the average sensational man. That is
to say, his mental life is that of the lower substratum of the mind, the life of the senses, the life of the sensations, the life
of the emotions, the life of practical conduct — the first status of the mental being. In all these he may be very active, very
vigorous, but he does not govern them by a higher light or seek to uplift them to a freer and nobler eminence; rather he pulls the
higher faculties down to the level of his senses, his sensations, his unenlightened and unchastened emotions, his gross utilitarian
practicality. His aesthetic side is little developed; either he cares nothing for beauty or has the crudest aesthetic tastes which help
to lower and vulgarise the general standard of aesthetic creation and the aesthetic sense. He is often strong about morals, far more
particular usually about moral conduct than the man of culture, but his moral being is as crude and undeveloped as the rest of
him; it is conventional, unchastened, unintelligent, a mass of likes and dislikes, prejudices and current opinions, attachment
to social conventions and respectabilities and an obscure dislike — rooted in the mind of sensations and not in the intelligence
—
of any open defiance or departure from the generally accepted standard of conduct. His ethical bent is a habit of the sensemind;
it is the morality of the average sensational man. He has a reason
and the appearance of an intelligent will, but they are not his own,
they are part of the group-mind, received from his environment; or
so far as they are his own, merely a practical, sensational,
emotional reason and will, a mechanical repetition of habitual
notions and rules of conduct, not a play of real thought and
intelligent determination. His use of them no more makes him a
developed mental being than the daily movement to and from his place
of business makes the average Londoner a developed physical being or
his quotidian contributions to the economic life of the country make
the bank-clerk a developed
economic man. He is not mentally active, but mentally reactive, — a very different matter.
Page –88
The Philistine is not dead, — quite the contrary, he abounds,
— but he no longer reigns. The sons of Culture have not exactly
conquered, but they have got rid of the old Goliath and replaced him by a new giant. This is the sensational man who has got
awakened to the necessity at least of some intelligent use of the higher faculties and is trying to be mentally active. He has been
whipped and censured and educated into that activity and he lives besides in a maelstrom of new information, new intellectual fashions, new ideas and new movements to which he can no longer be obstinately impervious. He is open to new ideas,
he can catch at them and hurl them about in a rather confused fashion; he can understand or misunderstand ideals, organise to
get them carried out and even, it would appear, fight and die for them. He knows he has to think about ethical problems,
social problems, problems of science and religion, to welcome new political developments, to look with as understanding an
eye as he can attain to at all the new movements of thought and inquiry and action that chase each other across the modern
field or clash upon it. He is a reader of poetry as well as a devourer of fiction and periodical literature,
— you will find in
him perhaps a student of Tagore or an admirer of Whitman; he has perhaps no very clear ideas about beauty and aesthetics, but
he has heard that Art is a not altogether unimportant part of life. The shadow of this new colossus is everywhere. He is the
great reading public; the newspapers and weekly and monthly reviews are his; fiction and poetry and art are his mental caterers,
the theatre and the cinema and the radio exist for him: Science hastens to bring her knowledge and discoveries to his doors
and equip his life with endless machinery; politics are shaped in his image. It is he who opposed and then brought about the
enfranchisement of women, who has been evolving syndicalism, anarchism, the war of classes, the uprising of labour, waging
what we are told are wars of ideas or of cultures, — a ferocious type of conflict made in the very image of this new barbarism,
—
or bringing about in a few days Russian revolutions which the century-long
efforts and sufferings of the intelligentsia failed to achieve.
Page –89
It is his coming which has been the precipitative agent
for the reshaping of the modern world. If a Lenin, a Mussolini, a Hitler have achieved their rapid and almost stupefying success,
it was because this driving force, this responsive quick-acting mass was there to carry them to victory
— a force lacking to
their less fortunate predecessors.
The first results of this momentous change have been inspiriting to our desire of movement, but a little disconcerting to the thinker and to the lover of a high and fine culture; for if it has to
some extent democratised culture or the semblance of culture, it does not seem at first sight to have elevated or strengthened it by
this large accession of the half-redeemed from below. Nor does the world seem to be guided any more directly by the reason and
intelligent will of her best minds than before. Commercialism is still the heart of modern civilisation; a sensational activism is
still its driving force. Modern education has not in the mass redeemed the sensational man; it has only made necessary to
him things to which he was not formerly accustomed, mental activity and occupations, intellectual and even aesthetic sensations, emotions of idealism. He still lives in the vital substratum, but he wants it stimulated from above. He requires an army
of writers to keep him mentally occupied and provide some sort of intellectual pabulum for him; he has a thirst for general
information of all kinds which he does not care or has not time to coordinate or assimilate, for popularised scientific knowledge,
for such new ideas as he can catch, provided they are put before him with force or brilliance, for mental sensations and excitation
of many kinds, for ideals which he likes to think of as actuating his conduct and which do give it sometimes a certain colour.
It is still the activism and sensationalism of the crude mental being, but much more open and free. And the cultured, the
intelligentsia find that they can get a hearing from him such as they never had from the pure Philistine, provided they can first
stimulate or amuse him; their ideas have now a chance of getting executed such as they never had before.
Page –90
The result has been to cheapen thought and art and literature, to
make talent and even
genius run in the grooves of popular success, to put the writer and thinker and scientist very much in a position like that of
the cultured Greek slave in a Roman household where he has to work for, please, amuse and instruct his master while keeping a
careful eye on his tastes and preferences and repeating trickily the manner and the points that have caught his fancy. The higher
mental life, in a word, has been democratised, sensationalised, activised with both good and bad results. Through it all the
eye of faith can see perhaps that a yet crude but an enormous change has begun. Thought and Knowledge, if not yet Beauty,
can get a hearing and even produce rapidly some large, vague, yet in the end effective will for their results; the mass of culture
and of men who think and strive seriously to appreciate and to know has enormously increased behind all this surface veil
of sensationalism, and even the sensational man has begun to undergo a process of transformation. Especially, new methods
of education, new principles of society are beginning to come into the range of practical possibility which will create perhaps
one day that as yet unknown phenomenon, a race of men — not only a class — who have to some extent found and developed
their mental selves, a cultured humanity.
Page –
91 |