God, the Invisible King
A REMARKABLE book with this title by
the well-known writer -and thinker, Mr. H. G. Wells, has recently appeared, of
which only a few extracts are before us, but these are sufficient to reveal its
character and thought. It is on the part of the writer, speaking not for
himself personally alone but as scribe to the spirit of his generation, a
definite renunciation of the gospel of an all-sufficient rationalism, a
discovery of God, a profession of faith in spirituality as the one lever by
which mankind can rise out of the darkness and confusion of its present state
into a more perfect living. He professes his faith in the God within, the
invisible King, who is the immortal part of us, in a coming kingdom of God upon
earth which shall not only be a spiritual state in the individual, but the open
brotherhood of a divine rule among men, and in self-identification with God,
service of him, absolute surrender to him as the whole rule of life for the
enlightened modern man. This is, indeed, a remarkable change of spirit and
change of mental outlook and, if Mr. Wells’ claim is just that he is writing as
a scribe to the spirit of his generation, it means a revolution in Europe far
more important than the Russian with all its idealism and its hopes for a new
and beneficent change in politics and society. It means the union of Eastern
spiritual knowledge and religious faith with Western pragmatic idealism and
their fusion into the basis of a new culture and, we will not say a new
universal religion, – for religion must vary with the variations of human
nature,- but a new practical spirituality in which all mankind can become one. Page-324 that the kingdom of God on earth is "not a metaphor, not a mere spiritual
state, not a dream, not an uncertain project, ..it is the close and inevitable
destiny of mankind". This classing of the inner spiritual state, the
kingdom of God within us, with a metaphor, a dream, an uncertain project
reveals the lingering taint of an excessive pragmatism. The spiritual state is
the one thing indispensable; until the mass of mankind can awaken into it, the
dream of a perfect society, an open brotherhood of God’s rule, must end in
failure and disappointment. The kingdom of God within is the sole possible
foundation for the kingdom of God without; for it is the spirit by which man
lives that conditions the outer forms of his life. All this is very forcibly said, but it shows that the writer has not grasped the whole spiritual truth; he has not gone deep enough inward. As once he dreamed of a class of scientific and Page -325 rational superman establishing a perfect social rule upon earth, so now he thinks that by the action of his banded servants of the invisible King declaring political and social war upon godless Czars, Kaisers, rulers and capitalists the same end can be achieved. With them is God; in them God dwells, in the others, presumably, he does not dwell; those who have surrendered absolutely to him are the citizens of the kingdom and on them shall be peace; those who do not surrender or even fall short in their surrender, are interlopers, against them the sword. A very old kind of militant religionism in a very modem form. It ignores two ancient, two eternal spiritual truths; first, that God dwells in all and, secondly, that only by becoming conscious of the God within from within can humanity be saved. God dwells in all and not only in the believer who is conscious of him;- dwells disguised and veiled, and it is by helping others to awaken to the veiled Divine within them that we go to the straight way to the founding of his kingdom on earth. True, an outward battle also has to be fought, but against institutions which stand in the way of the spreading of the light and the reign of brotherhood, not against men as unbelievers, – in a spirit of understanding, of knowledge, of firm will, but also of charity for ignorance and of love for the misled. God, says Mr. Wells, is boundless love, but this boundless love, it seems, is not infinite enough to embrace those who do not believe with you; it rejects them with a steadfast antagonism, it banishes them as "interlopers". God’s work least of all should be pursued in a spirit of partisan and sectarian antagonism, but rather with a remembrance that the battle is only a way to peace and the peace must come by the inner submission of the opponent through his recognition of the Divine, through his awakening. It is not enough that the believer should perform God’s will and fight for the performance of that will "in the acts and order of the state and nation of which he is a part". The nation also must be brought not only to believe, but to know, to see, to live in God, otherwise the national performance of God’s will, even if momentarily secured, will soon degenerate into a form. It is possible that what the old religions called "the rule of the saints" may be a preliminary step to the establishment of the full kingdom of God, but that rule Page -326 can only become secure by the
light and fire which is in them kindling itself in the hearts of all mankind. Page-327 whence; and because man appears to be finite, God whom they conceive of as the sum of human aspiration to good, truth, beauty, immortality, is also conceived of as finite. But how is that which has begun in Time secure against ending in Time? and how can a finite God be infinite love, courage, strength? Only that which was from ever, can be for ever, and only that which is infinite in being, can be infinite in force and quality. We have here an echo of the inconsequent Christian paradox of a soul born by the birth of the body, yet immortal to all eternity, combined with the metaphysical dogma of a God existent, not in being, but in becoming. There is an element of truth and value in this’ belief, but it brings disabling limitations into our inner realisation of God and the practice of a divine life to which it gives a foundation. Page -328 |